FRANZ KAFKA-A BRIEF INTRODUCTION
Posted in THE CY CHRONICLE on April 28th, 2009 by CY – 3 Comments
Franz Kafka: everybody knows the name, but most people have never read his work. I was one such person until I decided that enough was enough and tackled Metamorphosis and Other Stories. And I was hooked.
Kafka was born in Prague in 1883. He attended
the Charles-Ferdinand University of Prague and attained a doctorate in law in 1906 before spending his short life working for a state insurance company. He pursued his writing “on the side” in his spare time, like so many people do today.
He was the product of an overbearing father and, although he never married, he was twice engaged to Felice Bauer, his Czech translator. He also had relationships with Milena Jesenka-Pollak and Dora Diamant, who was his treasured companion until he died from tuberculosis in 1924.
Very few of Kafka’s stories were published during his life and he asked his friend, Max Brod to see that all the writings he left should be destroyed. Thankfully, Brod ignored this request and he undertook the posthumous publication of work such as The Trial, The Castle and Amerika.
There is a perception that Kafka’s work is impenetrable, worthy or even dull and irrelevant. All the talk of modernism, magic realism and existentialism turns many people off. However, fortune favours the brave as they say. And, as the translator, Michael Hofmann said, “…you need undergo no special training to prepare for him. There is no threshold of boredom or difficulty; you don’t even need to have a particularly literary disposition. He is formal but not unfriendly…(his work is) as approachable as it is strange, and as strange as it is approachable.”
At times Kaka’s work can almost be unbearably funny and absorbing. His work is not inherently sombre or grim and when read aloud, as it was by Kafka himself, people would fall about laughing. His language is straight forward; no redundant adjectives or adverbs. Although he does address themes such as hopelessness, and his characters are often already in the throes of a crisis, the end has yet to happen and there is always the possibility of change. In Metamorphosis Gregor Samsa wakes up as a cockroach and the prisoner in The Penal Colony is already in chains; the jackals in Jackals and Arabs may yet find their predicaments eased and in The Stoker Karl may yet find salvation.
So where does an adventurous reader start to get to know his work? I would suggest reading In the Penal Colony. This short story tells of a travelling researcher who visits a military colony where he is invited to witness the most incredible execution of a soldier. The officer/executioner, wearing tight-fitting parade uniform, proudly explains the means of punishment which is an elaborate piece of kit referred to as “the harrow”.
The officer proudly describes the harrow as follows.
“As you see, the harrow follows the human form: here is the harrow for the upper body, here the harrows for the legs. All there is for the head is one little spike. Do you understand?..When the man is lying on the bed, and the bed has begun to tremble, the harrow is lowered onto his body. It automatically adjusts itself so that it barely grazes his body with the tips of its needles…Trembling, it sticks its points into the body lying on the bed, which itself is trembling. To make it possible for anyone to view the way the sentence is carried out , the harrow is made of glass. Fitting the needles to it gave us many technical headaches, as you might imagine, but after many attempts the difficulties have been ironed out. We shirked no effort. And now anyone can see through the glass the way the inscription is made on the body…”
But all is not well with the murderous contraption. The officer berates the new commandant’s apparent failure to preserve the machinery of execution, to preserve fully the rituals. When the officer had, “…not without some trouble, forced the felt knob (of the harrow) into the condemned man’s mouth…the condemned man closed his eyes in a spasm of nausea and vomited. Hastily the officer snatched him up from the knob into the air, to turn his head to the pit; but it was too late and the spew was already all over the machine. ‘All the commandant’s fault!’ screamed the officer, and shook the brass rods in a fury, ‘the way the machine is being treated like a cowshed… And haven’t I just spent hours trying to get the commandant to understand that prisoners shouldn’t be fed on the eve of an execution. But no, with their new mild approach they do things differently. The commandant’s ladies stuff the man full of sugary sweet things…All his life he’s fed on stinking fish, and now he’s made to eat confectionary! But hey, why not, I wouldn’t really have any objections, but why have I not got a new felt, as I’ve been asking for the past three months? How can that man take that felt in his mouth without nausea anyway, when over a hundred men have sucked and bitten on it in their death throes?”
You may ask what hideous crime had been committed to warrant such punishment. The officer explained that, “This morning a captain brought a charge that this man, who is his batman, and sleeps outside his door, failed in the performance of his duty. He is required to get up every hour, and salute outside the captain’s door. Not a particularly arduous duty, and a very necessary one, because it keeps the man fresh for guard duty and for service to his master. Last night the captain whether his servant was discharging his duty properly. At the stroke of two, he opened his door, and found the man sprawled out asleep. He fetched his riding crop, and struck him a blow across the face. Instead of getting up and begging for forgiveness, the man grabbed his master by the legs, shook him, and cried: “Drop that whip or I’ll gobble you up.’”
Think about it. The trivial nature of the crime, the injustice within a strict military environment, the executioner’s anger about the new commandant’s modern ideas, the neglect of an instrument of torture. What motivates the executioner, and what should be his punishment? I recommend that you read the story to discover the executioner’s fate and whether the travelling researcher escapes a similar fate. The theme is dark and challenging but presented in a style that is certain to get you thinking…

What follows is an extract from the novel MODERN TRIALS.
“Mr Goldman will see you now.”
Sweet baby Mary, Peter and Judus this toxic mountain air is turnin me inside out. I know it’s been a couple of weeks since I last reported in but I’ve been confrontin heavy personal issues with the goat herding old timers since Tiff twisted me out of shape. Even if there had been electricity in the hut I’ve been squattin in, I was in no condition to go providin you with updates after that nasty scene in T Bar.
On 3rd March 2009 Jack Tweed was convicted of assaulting a taxi driver. He was sentenced to 12 weeks in prison, but is only expected to serve half of this term. Before considering this further it is worth analysing his criminal track record.
I used to own a car that had an electronic limiter. I know, it’s crazy, but I’m afraid that’s the world we live in. Obviously I had to do the decent thing and I chopped it in for a Porker. The only problem is that I still have a human limiter in the form of my wife so I have to take my chances when I can.
I was late leaving the office today. For some reason I was half blind, muttering to myself, as I charged through Covent Garden barging into free paper dispensers, Australians, Poles, cops, tramps, taxis and cyclists (on pavements, going the wrong way down one way streets, crashing into pensioners etc).
The trial ended horribly for the enemy. The reasons are somewhat technical, but involved an adverse Court of Appeal decision (well two actually) from an earlier (but related) action. The million quid they had expected from us (ie the client) was up in smoke and boy did that hurt.